COURSE CALENDAR

February:

22-25 CTAP

27-28 Combat Mindset: Pistol

March:

5-6 Combat Conditioning
13-14 Combat Mindset: Shotgun
22-25 CTAP

April:

3-4 Combat Conditioning
10-11 Combat Mindset: Non-Firearms
19-22 CTAP

May:

1-2 Combat Conditioning
8-9 Combat Mindset: Carbine
24-27 CTAP II

June:

7-11 CTAP
21-25 CTAP II 

10 March 2010
INTEGRATED COMBATIVE SYSTEMS

February 26, 2010

Form and Function
Hunter B. Armstrong
 
[adapted from "Form and Function" in Hop-Lite, No. 8, Fall 1999]
 
"Form follows function" is a principle that pertains to all combative training whether pop sports "martial arts," such as MMA, karate-do, wrestling, and fencing to the use of sword or firearm on the battlefield. Using the form-function rule as part of our perspective, it should be pretty obvious when looking at the form of a "fighting" system what its true function is.
 
 
Most of what we now call "martial arts" are pop sport or recreational systems. In most cases they are derived from systems that originally were functionally aimed at real combat. However, over the last fifty years in particular the greatest interest in "martial arts" has been for sport/recreational use or entertainment. Their popularity and spread has been based almost entirely on their use to those non-combat ends.
 
 
Modern karate provides a good example of the changes that typically occur. Modern karate has evolved over the past hundred years from a complex of Okinawan village and town self-defense systems that originally were used for actual fighting, though primarily by civilians. In karate's evolution, it was adopted from its primary use as village/town civilian self defense system to inclusion in Japan's educational system in the 1920's. There it was melded into a program of physical education. After World War II, what remained of karate (now, with a distinct Japanese flavor) was heavily influenced by its physical education context: competition in kata and sparring. American military personnel in post-war Japan were exposed to the system, and introduced it to the U.S. market. With its expansion abroad, it was primarily the overt competition elements that were popularized.
 
 
In its relatively new guise as a competitive sport, karate's form altered to meet the demands of the new function. Consider the change in characteristics in form and function from the a village/town fighting art to a modern combat sport:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
VILLAGE FIGHTING ART
 
POP SPORT SYSTEM
 
             Form
 
          Function
 
             Form
 
          Function
 
training outdoors on natural ground
 
preparation for environment of real fighting
 
training primarily on artificial floor of dojo
 
competition on same type of surface
 
variety of training methods: applications, strength conditioning, body hardening, makiwara, etc.
 
preparation for demands of real fighting
 
relatively limited training methods: form and sparring techniques
 
preparation for competition
 
stance/posture - relatively high
 
balance and mobility on rough ground against multiple opponents
 
stances/postures - lower more Adynamic@ looking
 
aesthetic value for competition
 
"one-step" restricted sparring only, but with no limitations in types of techniques (e.g., eye jabs, joint kicks, etc.)
 
real fighting demands destructive techniques
 
free sparring - limited techniques and targets
 
safety in competition
 
techniques aimed at structural damage
 
defeating adversary in real fighting
 
techniques aimed at general target areas
 
competition victory - points
 
no difference in techniques between kata and kumite
 
combative outcome demands that only applicable techniques are practiced
 
kumite and kata techniques are different
 
kata competition - demands techniques that "look good;" kumite demands techniques that earn sparring points
 
 
 
Again, the function for which a system evolves will alter the form of the system to suit that function. For example, on the sport side, if judges start giving more points for flashy kicking techniques, the system will alter to include such kicks. This is not a matter of good or bad fighting arts, it is simply a matter of changing functions forcing changes in the form.
 
 
The form of a system reveals the true function of the system. Unfortunately, people often believe that the system they're practicing is for one thing-typically combat-when the form of the system shows that it is primarily for sport. Variations of this theme can be seen in all of the popular "fighting" systems, whether they are Asian based systems or Western combat sports such as boxing, fencing, or "combat" handgun competitions.
 
 
The confusion and real problems occur when the two ends are confused - when people assume that a system that has evolved for one function will be equally suitable for another. Typical is the belief that a system that has evolved for sport or recreational purposes can function equally well in real combat. This occurs even though there are great and readily apparent differences in the techniques used for sport and combat.
 
 
Combat has intense and demanding characteristics that the form of any combat system must comply with if its function is to truly prepare for combat. That form is not going to be as aesthetically pleasing nor as sportingly functional as the forms of systems that have sport ends. If sport techniques are used in combat or combat techniques used in sport the consequences can easily lead to injury in the latter or death in the former.
 
 
Integrated Combative Systems, by its nature, is aimed at developing a systematic approach toward understanding as effectively as possible training the mindset for lethal combat. To that end, it is imperative that we recognize and clearly delineate the differences in combative behavior-and-performance between lethal combat systems and those whose functions are aimed at other ends.
 
 
 
 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

Welcome to the new Integrated Combative Systems website. On this homepage we will be posting articles, after-action reports of training courses, gear reviews, and pertinent ICS updates.

 

ICS is continually expanding its range of capabilities for training armed professionals. In doing so, ICS has codified its principles and methods of training into a comprehensive martial system called BattleHand. At the core of BattleHand is the development of the combative mindset. In training this mindset we include the full range of weapons, from firearms to bayonets to knives to empty-hands. The principle of weapons training as the foundation of warrior mindset and skills embodies the axiom of "One Mind, Any Weapon."As well as creating the BattleHand system, the core place for training BattleHand has been established at the Spartan Training Center in Sedona, AZ.

 

We continue to devote our time and efforts to effective martial training, and we are sure that our new website will enhance the capability of spreading, sharing, and advancing knowledge of human combative behavior and its performance.